Jewish Women as Industrious Earners
By ALLISON SCHACHTER
Between 17th-century Europe and contemporary American
Jewish culture, the representations of Jewish women and money have reversed. In
traditional European culture, a woman was valorized if she could earn enough
money to support her family, allowing her husband to devote himself entirely to
studying Jewish texts. By the late 19th-century, however, Jewish intellectuals
embraced European bourgeois gender norms, and perceived Jewish women’s roles as
economic providers as backwards. Once valued as industrious earners, Jewish
women were now to be relegated to the domestic sphere, while Jewish men
transformed themselves into ideal breadwinners. By the mid-20th century in
America, Jewish women were stripped of their once-admired economic utility and
portrayed as predatory spenders or parasitic consumers—as overbearing mothers
or Jewish-American princesses.
This negative turn in the cultural representation of Jewish women as greedy
consumers is a recent phenomenon. In the 17th-century, Glückel of Hameln
authored one of the earliest-known Jewish memoirs, detailing the rise and fall
of her own fortunes. A 54-year-old woman with business acumen, her obsession
with money was practical: widowed with eight of her 12 children unmarried, she
took over her husband’s business to ensure her children’s future. In the
memoir, Glückel lovingly describes her marriage as a business partnership,
boasting that her husband would turn only to her for business advice.
While Glückel unselfconsciously proclaimed her business smarts in 17th-century
Prussia, by the 19th-century women’s economic power became a source of Jewish
cultural anxiety. In his satirical epistolary novel, The Letters of Menakhem-Mendl and Sheyne-Sheyndl, Sholem Aleichem portrays a very different
gendered economy. Menakhem-Mendl, the prototypical Jewish luftmentsh, absconds with his
wife’s dowry to Odessa where he plays the commodities exchange. In letters home
to his wife, Sheyne-Sheyndl, he spins tales of markets he barely comprehends
and describes the marble tables of Café Fanconi and elegant displays of gold
jewelry and women’s clothing. His wife’s letters, however, provide a different
tone. Sheyne-Sheyndl does not care about fancy cafes or shop windows; she understands
the value of a ruble and how far it will go to pay for medical care. In
increasingly angry letters, she pleads with her husband to sell his holdings
and return home. Whereas Glückel’s husband respected his wife’s financial
advice, the fictional Menakhem-Mendl ignores his wife’s urgent pleas.
Sheyne-Sheyndl’s fears of abandonment and her economic vulnerability mark a
turning point in the representation of Jewish women. A Jewish woman’s practical
concern for her children’s welfare and her fears of abandonment, by the end of
the 19th century, are dismissed, disparaged, and satirized. While
Sheyne-Sheyndl frets, it is her husband who fantasizes about fortunes, seduced
by the unattained decadence and luxury of the urban arcades.
In 20th-century American Jewish culture we see the culmination of a dramatic
reversal in the representation of Jewish women. Jewish men become economic
heroes—the shrewd accountants and business executives—while Jewish women are
the wasteful consumers, who pine after great fortunes and the fashionable items
on display in America’s shopping malls.